SA-25-05: Route 220 Alternate (Cloverdale Road) - Botetourt County

SA2505 Overview Map

From Eastpark Drive to Read Mountain Road

Project Purpose

The purpose of this study is to identify project recommendations for the Route 220 Alternate (Cloverdale Road) corridor within Botetourt County. This study will focus on improving roadway safety, capacity preservation (to keep traffic flowing smoothly), multimodal accessibility/connectivity (bicycle and transit), and transportation demand management (TDM) needs. The project recommendations from this study may be developed into funding applications for SMART SCALE Round 7 and other transportation funding programs.

Survey

The Phase 1 survey regarding current transportation needs on Route 220 Alternate (Cloverdale Road) between Eastpark Drive and Read Mountain Road was completed in June. The study team will use the input obtained from the public to better focus on solutions and develop alternatives to address the identified needs.

 

Study Partners

  • Botetourt County
  • Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization

Key Points of Contact

District Leads: Michael Gray, Carol Moneymaker, and William Crawford

Lead Consultant: Dana Trone

Schedule

Start date: March 2025

End date: August 2026

Study Documents

Dates Number of Participants (unique individuals)
May 19-June 2, 2025
874

 

The following needs have been identified for this study. Do you agree with these needs?
Capacity preservation (keep traffic flowing smoothly) 86%
Safety 80%
Transportation demand management (TDM) 52%
Transit access 19%
Bicycle access 16%

 

Rank the following needs in order of importance to you along the study area.
Reducing traffic congestion 88%
Corridor safety / intersection safety 84%
Speeding / aggressive driving 78%
Proper pavement marking and signage 77%
Pedestrian safety and accessibility 63%
Public transit access and service 62%
Bicycle safety and accessibility 61%

 

Which of the following safety issues concern you?
Speeding / aggressive driving 64%
Sudden stopping / rear-end crashes 54%
Running red lights 54%
Side-impact crashes 39%
Difficulty weaving / merging 28%
Inadequate pavement marking and signage 24%
Inadequate lighting 24%
Lack of sidewalks / missing sidewalks 18%
Insufficient / missing crosswalks and pedestrian signal timing 11%
Inadequate bicycle facilities 10%
Other 8%
Closely spaced driveways 6%
Inadequate transit / bus stops 5%
Lack of ADA ramps and accessibility 2%

 

What mobility issues do you typically experience when using the study area?
Difficulty making left turns 54%
Poor signal coordination 44%
Lack of turn lanes 31%
Difficulty accessing businesses 20%
Vehicles blocking entrances 20%
Difficulty when riding a bicycle 7%
Other 7%
Difficulty when walking 6%

 

What mode(s) of travel do you use when traveling along the study area?
Personal vehicle 99%
Truck or commercial vehicle 8%
Walking 3%
Carpool / Vanpool 3%
Cycling 2%
Other 1%
Taxi / Uber / Lyft 1%
Metro bus, local bus, or commuter bus 0%

 

Last updated: June 17, 2025

Alert Icon

Please note that this file is not ADA compliant. Choose one of below options: