SA-25-05: Route 220 Alternate (Cloverdale Road) - Botetourt County
From Eastpark Drive to Read Mountain Road
Project Purpose
The purpose of this study is to identify project recommendations for the Route 220 Alternate (Cloverdale Road) corridor within Botetourt County. This study will focus on improving roadway safety, capacity preservation (to keep traffic flowing smoothly), multimodal accessibility/connectivity (bicycle and transit), and transportation demand management (TDM) needs. The project recommendations from this study may be developed into funding applications for SMART SCALE Round 7 and other transportation funding programs.
Survey
The Phase 2 survey regarding proposed alternatives for the Route 220 Alternate (Cloverdale Road) corridor between Eastpark Drive and Read Mountain Road in Botetourt County was completed in December 2025. The study team will use the input obtained from the public as it refines the alternatives and performs planning-level cost estimation before selecting the preferred alternative(s) to address the identified needs.
Study Partners
- Botetourt County
- Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization
Key Points of Contact
District Leads: Michael Gray, Carol Moneymaker, and William Crawford
Lead Consultant: Dana Trone
Schedule
Start date: March 2025
End date: August 2026
Study Documents
| Dates | Number of Participants (unique individuals) |
|---|---|
|
May 19-June 2, 2025
|
874 |
| The following needs have been identified for this study. Do you agree with these needs? | |
|---|---|
| Capacity preservation (keep traffic flowing smoothly) | 86% |
| Safety | 80% |
| Transportation demand management (TDM) | 52% |
| Transit access | 19% |
| Bicycle access | 16% |
| Rank the following needs in order of importance to you along the study area. | |
|---|---|
| Reducing traffic congestion | 88% |
| Corridor safety / intersection safety | 84% |
| Speeding / aggressive driving | 78% |
| Proper pavement marking and signage | 77% |
| Pedestrian safety and accessibility | 63% |
| Public transit access and service | 62% |
| Bicycle safety and accessibility | 61% |
| Which of the following safety issues concern you? | |
|---|---|
| Speeding / aggressive driving | 64% |
| Sudden stopping / rear-end crashes | 54% |
| Running red lights | 54% |
| Side-impact crashes | 39% |
| Difficulty weaving / merging | 28% |
| Inadequate pavement marking and signage | 24% |
| Inadequate lighting | 24% |
| Lack of sidewalks / missing sidewalks | 18% |
| Insufficient / missing crosswalks and pedestrian signal timing | 11% |
| Inadequate bicycle facilities | 10% |
| Other | 8% |
| Closely spaced driveways | 6% |
| Inadequate transit / bus stops | 5% |
| Lack of ADA ramps and accessibility | 2% |
| What mobility issues do you typically experience when using the study area? | |
|---|---|
| Difficulty making left turns | 54% |
| Poor signal coordination | 44% |
| Lack of turn lanes | 31% |
| Difficulty accessing businesses | 20% |
| Vehicles blocking entrances | 20% |
| Difficulty when riding a bicycle | 7% |
| Other | 7% |
| Difficulty when walking | 6% |
| What mode(s) of travel do you use when traveling along the study area? | |
|---|---|
| Personal vehicle | 99% |
| Truck or commercial vehicle | 8% |
| Walking | 3% |
| Carpool / Vanpool | 3% |
| Cycling | 2% |
| Other | 1% |
| Taxi / Uber / Lyft | 1% |
| Metro bus, local bus, or commuter bus | 0% |
SA-25-05 Phase 1 Executive Summary - PDF, 638KB
The Phase 2 survey regarding proposed alternatives for the Route 220 Alternate (Cloverdale Road) corridor between Eastpark Drive and Read Mountain Road in Botetourt County was completed in December 2025.
| Dates | Number of Participants (unique individuals) |
|---|---|
|
December 8-22, 2025
|
315 |
Route 220 Alternate at Eastpark Drive
The right-turn lane along Eastpark Drive is proposed to be extended to reduce delays.
The left-turn lanes along Route 220 Alternate are proposed to be shifted toward the medians to increase sight distance and reduce the potential for left-turn crashes.
Concurrent phasing is proposed for Eastpark Drive and Exxon to allow for simultaneous turns which would improve traffic operations and reduce delays at the intersection.
Rate the improvements on a scale of 1 to 5. (306 responses)
| 1. Strongly oppose | 2. Somewhat oppose | 3. Neutral | 4. Somewhat support | 5. Strongly support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extend right-turn lane along Eastpark Drive |
6% |
5% |
26% |
22% |
41% |
| Offset left-turn lanes along Route 220 Alternate |
6% |
7% |
14% |
27% |
46% |
| Install concurrent signal phasing for Eastpark Drive and Exxon approaches |
7% |
6% |
17% |
23% |
47% |
Route 220 Alternate at Read Mountain Road
Two improvement options are proposed for the intersection of Route 220 Alternate at Read Mountain Road. The following improvements are proposed with both options:
- Extend the left-turn lane along northbound Route 220 Alternate at Read Mountain Road to reduce delays and accommodate left-turning vehicles.
- Extend the right-turn lane along eastbound Read Mountain Road to reduce delays and accommodate right-turning vehicles.
- Add a right-turn overlap phase for eastbound right-turns from Read Mountain Road to reduce delays and allow right turns to turn on a green arrow.
- Install protected-only left-turn signal phasing during the PM peak hour for the northbound Route 220 Alternate left turns to Read Mountain Road that would allow left turns to turn on a green arrow only.
Route 220 Alternate - Option 1 - Offset Left-Turn Lane
Option 1 includes offsetting the left-turn lane (shifting it toward the median) to improve sight distance and reduce the potential for left-turn crashes.
Route 220 Alternate - Option 2 - Continuous Green-T
Option 2 includes a Continuous Green-T intersection that would allow the northbound Route 220 Alternate through traffic to flow through the intersection without stopping. An acceleration lane would be installed within the median for left turns from Read Mountain Road. The southbound Route 220 Alternate U-turn lane would be removed. A Continuous Green-T intersection is an innovative intersection design. Click here to learn more about a Continuous Green-T.
Rate the improvements on a scale of 1 to 5. (209 responses)
| 1. Strongly oppose | 2. Somewhat oppose | 3. Neutral | 4. Somewhat support | 5. Strongly support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extend left-turn lane along northbound Route 220 Alternate |
3% |
2% |
7% |
23% |
65% |
| Extend right-turn lane along eastbound Read Mountain Road |
7% |
1% |
9% |
23% |
60% |
| Add a right-turn overlap phase for eastbound Read Mountain Road |
6% |
4% |
23% |
26% |
41% |
| Install protected-only left-turn signal phasing (turn on green arrow only) for northbound Route 220 Alternate during the PM peak hour |
15% |
8% |
9% |
22% |
46% |
| Option 1 - Offset northbound left-turn lane |
6% |
5% |
25% |
28% |
35% |
| Option 2 - Install a Continuous Green-T Intersection |
26% |
7% |
21% |
12% |
34% |
Last updated: January 14, 2026
